Queues, Topics, and Their Trade-offs

Five questions to pick the "right" one.

Thank you to our sponsors who keep this newsletter free:

Multiplayer auto-documents your system, from the high-level logical architecture down to the individual components, APIs, dependencies, and environments. Perfect for teams looking to streamline system design and documentation management without the manual overhead. 

You may have heard about the benefits of adding asynchronous processing to your system design. With async processing, you can:

• Build more resilient systems.

• Build event-driven architectures.

• Have scalable systems.

You can do this using Queues and Topics. But which one should you use? They serve different purposes, and making the right choice depends on your requirements.

Here are the five questions you can use to decide:

1. Application Requirements: One-to-One vs. One-to-Many

The most critical question is: Do you need one-to-one or one-to-many messaging?

• Use a Queue to ensure that exactly one consumer processes each message. Queues follow a point-to-point model: a single producer sends messages that one consumer processes.

• Use a Topic if you need to send messages to multiple consumers. Topics follow a publish-subscribe model—every subscriber receives a copy of each message. Topics work well for broadcasting events like notifications.

  

  Sketched using Multiplayer

2. Message Durability and Delivery Guarantees

How important is message durability to your application?

• Queues provide strong message durability by design. If you can't afford to lose messages, queues help by keeping messages until they are processed and acknowledged by a consumer.

• Topics can also offer durability, but this typically requires additional configuration and often depends on the technology. If you need a simple, reliable solution for keeping messages safe, queues are usually a better fit.

3. Scalability

How does your application need to scale?

• Queues can distribute work across multiple consumers. Adding more consumers will help scale the workload, ensuring each consumer processes a unique message. This distribution model is ideal for handling high throughput.

• Topics broadcast messages to all subscribers. Adding more subscribers does not split the workload; every subscriber processes every message. Topics are suitable for sharing information but can't efficiently divide tasks. Queues are better for efficient load distribution.

Sketched using Multiplayer

4. Handling Consumer Failures

What happens if a consumer is unavailable?

• Queues handle consumer failures well. If a consumer goes offline, the queue retains the message until the consumer can process it, making queues ideal for reliability.

• Queues also support Dead Letter Queues (DLQs), which act as a safety net for unprocessable messages. When messages cannot be consumed after several retries, they are sent to a DLQ for troubleshooting, preventing issues from clogging up the main queue.

• With Topics, keeping track of which subscribers received which messages adds complexity, especially if order matters. Managing this state can introduce overhead and make handling consumer failures more challenging.

  

  Sketched using Multiplayer

5. Flexibility vs. Stability

Is your system stable or evolving?

• Topics provide flexibility that works well for fast-evolving systems. You can add more subscribers or change subscription models without re-architecting the entire system.

• Queues, in contrast, offer simplicity. For stable, well-defined workflows, queues help keep things direct and reduce unnecessary complexity.

Let’s put all these in context with a real-world example in an E-commerce System:

• Use queues for order processing to ensure each order is handled exactly once.

Sketched using Multiplayer

• Use topics for inventory updates to broadcast changes to multiple interested services (e.g., analytics, recommendations, and customer notifications).

Sketched using Multiplayer

Choosing the Right One

The decision between topics and queues ultimately depends on your application's requirements:

• If you need point-to-point communication, use queues.

• For broadcasting information, use topics.

• If durability and reliability are essential, start with queues.

• If you want scalability by distributing tasks across many consumers, queues again offer a better solution.

• Likewise, if you need flexibility to adapt to evolving requirements, topics may give you the necessary agility.

Summary

Start with queues for a simple foundation, especially in the early stages of system development. As your system grows and requires more flexibility, adopting topics might make sense.

Keep these five guiding questions in mind:

1. One-to-one or one-to-many messaging?

2. How critical is message durability?

3. Do you need workload distribution or information sharing?

4. How do you handle consumer failures?

5. Is the system stable or evolving?

Answering these questions will help you pick the right messaging tool for your architecture.

Remember: Queues keep it simple; Topics keep it flexible.

How do you pick the "right" one?

---

System Design Classroom is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

---

Articles I enjoyed this week

• How Facebook Was Able to Support a Billion Users via Software Load Balancer by

  Neo Kim

• 3 Kafka Messaging Strategies by

  Saurabh Dashora

• Protobuf by

  Franco Fernando

• The Developer’s Cheat Sheet Collection - Part 1 by

  Mayank Ahuja

• 11 Resume Mistakes You're Probably Making by

  Gina Acosta

---

Thank you for reading System Design Classroom. If you like this post, share it with your friends!